THE GUIDE

A dollar that settles like a text message.

Strip away the crypto noise and a stablecoin is one idea: a digital IOU for a real dollar, moving on rails that never close. $320B+ of them now circulate — and the interesting part isn't the technology. It's who earns the interest.

SCROLL ↓
PART 01

Mint, move, redeem.

The whole life of a stablecoin dollar, in three legs. Note where it's instant and nearly free — and where the old world (and its fees) reappears.

PART 02

The business model is the float.

HOW THE PEG WORKS

A money-market fund wearing a token

A regulated dollar stablecoin like USDC is backed (post-GENIUS Act, by law) 1:1 with cash and short-term Treasuries. USDT, the largest, is issued by an offshore company on a contested compliance path whose past attestations have included other assets — same mechanic, different rulebook. Either way you hold the token; the issuer holds the T-bills and keeps the interest. At ~$190B of USDT earning ~4–5%, Tether became one of the most profitable companies per employee on earth. The product is free; the float is the business.

THE GENIUS ACT · US, 2025

From gray zone to licensed instrument

The 2025 US law — implementing rules proposed in early 2026, full effect by January 2027 — requires 100% high-quality liquid reserves, regular audits, and licensed issuers. Translation: stablecoins got the money-market-fund rulebook. The EU's MiCA did similar in 2024. Regulation didn't kill the product — it invited the banks in.

THE VOLUME ASTERISK

Read the $46T claim carefully

Raw on-chain volume (~$46T in 2025) gets compared to Visa — but much of it is bots, exchange shuffling, and the same dollar lapping the track. Adjusted "organic" volume is far smaller, though still trillions and growing fast. Both things are true: the hype inflates it, and it's still enormous.

WHEN PEGS BREAK

The two cautionary tales

Terra/UST (2022): an "algorithmic" stablecoin backed by confidence instead of collateral — $40B+ evaporated in a week. USDC (March 2023): briefly traded at $0.87 when Circle disclosed reserves stuck in Silicon Valley Bank — even real collateral has bank risk. Every rule now on the books traces back to one of these two weekends.

WHO ACTUALLY USES THEM

Less Starbucks, more São Paulo

Day-to-day retail payments? Rare — cards and instant rails are already good. The real demand: B2B cross-border settlement (treasury moving money on weekends), dollar savings in high-inflation economies — Sofía in Buenos Aires converts part of her paycheck to digital dollars the day she's paid, before the peso can lose more value — and exchange plumbing. Stablecoins win where local rails are weak or the local currency is weaker.

THE INCUMBENTS' MOVE

If you can't beat the rail, issue on it

Visa and Mastercard settle some flows in USDC; PayPal issued PYUSD; banks are piloting deposit tokens; payment processors quietly added stablecoin payouts. The pattern from every chapter repeats: new rails don't replace the old ones — they get absorbed by whoever owns distribution.

PART 03

The remittance, rerun.

The $1,000 to Mumbai took the SWIFT chain and arrived $65 lighter. Same journey by stablecoin — honest version, ramps included:

The middle leg — the actual border crossing — costs cents and takes seconds, against $40 and days for correspondent banking. But the ends are where the fight is: getting local money into stablecoins (on-ramp) and out (off-ramp, with FX) still costs real money and needs licenses, compliance, and local bank partners. The disruptors aren't competing on the blockchain; they're competing on the ramps.

$320B+
stablecoins in circulation (May 2026) — USDT ~$190B, USDC ~$77B
24/7
settlement — no cutoffs, no weekends, no correspondent chain
REMITTANCE STATEMENT
USD → INR · VIA USDC · MINUTES
AMOUNT SENT$1,000.00
ON-RAMP ~0.5%−$5.00
NETWORK FEE−$0.05
OFF-RAMP + FX ~1%−$9.95
ARRIVES$985.00
COST 1.5% VS 6.5% BY SWIFT WIRE — RAMP PRICING VARIES WIDELY
CROSSING TIME  SECONDS–MINUTES · 24×7
CAVEAT  RECIPIENT NEEDS AN OFF-RAMP — THE REAL BOTTLENECK
FIELD NOTES — THE PRO LAYER

For the professionals.

The reserve-desk view: attestation vs audit, how depegs actually unfold, redemption mechanics, and the CBDC question.

ATTESTATION vs AUDIT — READ THE FINE PRINT ON "BACKED"
Most 'proof of reserves' documents are attestations: an accountant confirms that at a moment in time, stated assets existed — agreed-upon procedures, narrow scope. An audit opines on complete financial statements: liabilities too, internal controls, the whole picture. The gap matters: an attestation can be true while the issuer owes more than it holds elsewhere. Post-GENIUS Act (US) and MiCA (EU), regulated issuers face monthly reserve reporting, composition rules (cash and short T-bills, not commercial paper — the reform Tether's 2021 CFTC settlement foreshadowed) and redemption guarantees. Professional reading order for any coin: who issues it, under which regime, what exactly does the monthly document assert, and who bears the gap if it's wrong — the same questions as deposit insurance in what money actually is, minus the insurance.
ANATOMY OF A DEPEG — TWO PRICES, ONE PROMISE
A stablecoin has two prices: the issuer's primary redemption promise ($1, for verified institutional redeemers) and the secondary market price everyone actually sees. Depegs happen when the secondary market doubts the primary promise or can't reach it fast enough. USDC, March 2023: $3.3B of reserves stuck in Silicon Valley Bank over a weekend — with redemptions closed until Monday, the secondary price hit ~$0.87 while arbitrageurs who trusted the Monday-morning redemption window bought the discount and were made whole. Terra/UST 2022 was the other species entirely: algorithmic backing (its own volatile sister token) meant redemption arbitrage itself minted the death spiral — $40B+ gone. The taxonomy lesson: fiat-reserve depegs are liquidity events that mean-revert if reserves are real; algorithmic depegs are solvency discoveries. Know which risk you're holding.
MINT/REDEEM MECHANICS — WHO TOUCHES THE ISSUER
Retail users almost never mint or redeem — they buy on exchanges. Direct mint/redeem runs through the issuer's verified institutional customers (exchanges, market makers): wire dollars → issuer mints coins (and vice versa), with KYC, minimums and cutoff times. Peg stability is really an arbitrage loop: secondary price below $1 → institutions buy cheap, redeem at par, pocket the difference, supply shrinks, price recovers. That loop is also the run mechanism — which is why regulation obsesses over redemption rights and timing (T+1 style guarantees under the new regimes). Also in the fine print: issuers can and do freeze addresses under sanctions orders (Tornado Cash made this concrete). A regulated stablecoin is censorable money by design — a feature to a compliance officer, a bug to a cypherpunk, a fact for everyone.
STABLECOINS vs CBDCs vs TOKENIZED DEPOSITS — THE THREE-WAY RACE
Three projects digitize the dollar/euro/rupee, with different liability holders. Stablecoin: liability of a private issuer, backed by reserves — permissionless distribution, credit risk on the issuer. CBDC: liability of the central bank itself — no credit risk, maximal policy control, privacy and disintermediation fights (the ECB's digital euro grinds forward; India pilots e₹; the US legislated against a retail CBDC in 2025's wave, choosing regulated stablecoins as the American answer). Tokenized deposits: your existing bank balance, on-chain (JPM Coin-style) — stays inside banking regulation, interoperates poorly outside its consortium. The 2026 scoreboard: stablecoins won distribution, tokenized deposits won institutional settlement pilots, CBDCs won policy papers. Payments professionals should watch where merchant acceptance lands — that's the race that pays.
WHERE THE YIELD GOES — THE FLOAT POLITICS
Reserves earn T-bill yield; coin holders traditionally earn zero. That spread is the business model (Circle and Tether's profits are functionally money-market funds with distribution) — and the battleground. US law (GENIUS) bars issuers from paying interest directly to holders, pushing the yield fight to structure: exchanges paying 'rewards' on balances, the Open USD consortium model distributing reserve income to distribution partners rather than holders (this week's news page, not coincidentally), and tokenized money-market funds competing for the same wallet share with actual yield. Follow the float: every stablecoin partnership announcement is really a negotiation over who keeps the interest on your digital dollars.
PART 04

Remember three things.

1
A stablecoin is a bearer money-market fund. You get the dollar's stability; the issuer gets the dollar's interest. Understand that trade and you understand the whole industry — including why everyone suddenly wants to be an issuer.
2
The crossing was never the hard part. Like SWIFT before it, the middle is cheap — the ends are expensive. On/off-ramps, compliance, and local liquidity are where stablecoin businesses win or die.
3
Regulation was the unlock, not the threat. GENIUS Act + MiCA turned a gray-zone product into licensed infrastructure — and the immediate result was banks, networks, and PayPal piling in. The rebels built a rail; the incumbents are laying track on it.